Concetta Faro
1867–1887
Of Linguaglossa.
What the record says
The story
Where they came from
Parents
The mark is the archive's grade for the person (documented, probable, inferred, family, disputed). A «link» mark says where the link itself comes from, and appears only where the archive has tested it. Being on the direct line is the bar at the top of the page, not a grade.
Birth
1867Brothers and sisters1
What they left behind
About this record
Venerando's first wife, who died thirteen days after the birth of their son. Written FARA in the birth act and FARO in her marriage and death acts (the Atlas catalogue treats the two as one name). A CANDIDATE BIRTH ACT: Linguaglossa Nati 1866 atto 176 (an_ua81360, image 58 left page; the annual index lists «Faro Concetta 176», and the session zoomed the act): the act of about 20 September 1866 (the margin number is faint) records a girl, Concetta, born at three in the afternoon at Linguaglossa (quarter San Rocco) to GIOVANNI FARO, son of the late Sebastiano, 31?, and his wife MARIA R[agusa?], daughter of Giuseppe, 35?.Read on
It fits her stated age at marriage (19 in July 1886) and at death (20 in May 1887) and her parents' names (Giovanni, Maria), and her father is 'fu Giovanni' by 1886. NOT PROVED: the mother's surname is cut at the page edge in the zoom (it begins Ra-), the day of the birth is not read, and a second Concetta of another Faro father (Nati 1892: Faro Concetta di Sebastiano) is a different, later girl.
Where this comes from
This person is not in the family's file. They exist here because an act names them, and this archive has read it. The register gives their trade as contadina. The reading is Linguaglossa Matrimoni 1886 atto 45; Piedimonte Etneo Morti 1887 atto 39; Nati 1887 atto 108; Linguaglossa Nati 1866 atto 176 (a candidate, image 58 of an_ua81360). Nothing on this page comes from Michael's export, which never held them — so there is no tree account here to agree or disagree with, and the pieces the export arrived in do not include them. How many there are →
All 3 of the relationships named above have been proved by a record this archive has read, rather than taken from the family tree.
No record has been read for this person. What is known of them is what the tree asserts, and it is unverified.